Two types of mobility

nomadic hunter-gatherer

reciprocity of a gift

hunter-gatherer society

pure gift

Emorya believes that the principle of reciprocity was formed after settlement

Thought experiment on [nomadic hunter-gatherer

25-50 persons

Joint deposition of food = equal distribution

Joint hunting

Constant movement makes it impossible to stockpile the harvest

Reciprocity principle that avoids the state

Emaya: "The idea that agriculture led to settlement is dubious."

Hunter-gatherers also settle

Cases where settlement did not result in accumulation of products and inequality of wealth and power

A mechanism was invented to prevent

We call this the "settlement revolution."

Advanced Society

The Way Beyond the State

How can we introduce reciprocity without relying on God's commands?

The original father never existed.

Family bonding was fragile.

Nation = Original Father

Prevent this formation

totemism

repetition of the original father-killer

Freud thought the murdered original father would regress.

Emorya considered the mobility lost by settlement, and the freedom and equality it brings

Two Kinds of Nomads

Farming and cattle raising emerged in the original city.

child

Agriculture and cattle raising → expansion of productive forces → urban development → class decomposition → state

reverse

The "original city" began as a place of trade between communities.

Trade → original city → information accumulation → agriculture

Emaya supports this hypothesis.

Criticizes the idea that cattle ranching occurred as a development of husbandry

Sheep, for example, are herding animals that live in herds on grasslands.

Occurred in the meadows.

Karaya: invented in the original city where information accumulates

Agriculture and cattle raising invented

Differentiation between farmers and nomads

Nomads left the original city and became nomadic.

Restored the nomadic nature that was present in nomadic hunter-gatherers.

Nomads conquer and subjugate farmers.

State Formation

Exchange of protection for obedience

interchange format B

No absolute authority arises from within the community.

External conquests are necessary for a kingdom to be established

Even if conquest does not take place, defense against the threat of conquest creates a collectivized state.

Nomads are between communities and infiltrate them through commerce and war

Nomadic nomadism is exchange modes B and C, not A

Nomadology cannot transcend state and capital.

A new type of nomad

With this kind of playfulness, you can't go beyond capital=nation=state.

The clue to transcend is hunter-gatherer nomadism.

That is the exchange style D

Comes compulsively as a "regression of the repressed" as was the case with Exchange Form A.

Yanagida worked all his life on the nomadic nature of pre-settlement

---